"Flags, Free Thought, and Fanatics:
Where Are We After September 11?"
by Rev. Kimi Riegel
September 15, 2002
Let
Let it be the dream it used to be.
Let it be the pioneer on the plain
Seeking a home where he himself is free.
(
Let
Let it be that great strong land of love
Where never kings connive nor tyrants scheme
That any man be crushed by one above.
(It never was
O, let my land be a
land where
Is crowned with no false patriotic wreath,
But opportunity is real, and life is free,
Equality is in the air we breathe.
(There's never been
equality for me,
Nor freedom in this "homeland of the free.")
Say, who are you
that mumbles in the dark?
And who are you that draws your veil across the stars?
I am the poor white,
fooled and pushed apart,
I am the Negro bearing slavery's scars.
I am the red man driven from the land,
I am the immigrant clutching the hope I seek –
And finding only the same old stupid plan
Of dog eat dog, of mighty crush the weak.
I am the young man,
full of strength and hope,
Tangled in that ancient endless chain
Of profit, power, gain, of grab the land!
Of grab the gold! Of grab the ways of satisfying need!
Of work the men! Of take the pay!
Of owning everything for one's own greed!
I am the farmer,
bondsman to the soil.
I am the worker sold to the machine.
I am the Negro, servant to you all.
I am the people, humble, hungry, mean –
Hungry yet today despite the dream.
Beaten yet today – O, Pioneers!
I am the man who never got ahead,
The poorest worker bartered through the years.
Yet I'm the one who
dreamt our basic dream
In the Old World while still a serf of kings,
Who dreamt a dream so strong, so brave, so true,
That even yet its mighty daring sings
In every brick and stone, in every furrow turned
That's made America the land it has become.
O, I'm the man who sailed those early seas
In search of what I meant to be my home –
For I'm the one who left dark Ireland's shore,
And Poland's plain, and England's grassy lea,
And torn from Black Africa's strand I came
To build a "homeland of the free."
The free?
Who said the free? Not
me?
Surely not me? The millions on relief today?
The millions shot down when we strike?
The millions who have nothing for our pay?
For all the dreams we've dreamed
And all the songs we've sung
And all the hopes we've held
And all the flags we've hung,
The millions who have nothing for our pay –
Except the dream that's almost dead today.
O, let
The land that never has been yet –
And yet must be – the land where every man is free.
The land that's mine – the poor man's, Indian's, Negro's, ME –
Who made America,
Whose sweat and blood, whose faith and pain,
Whose hand at the foundry, whose plow in the rain,
Must bring back our mighty dream again.
Sure, call me any ugly
name you choose –
The steel of freedom does not stain.
From those who live like leeches on the people's lives,
We must take back our land again,
O, yes,
I say it plain,
And yet I swear this oath –
Out
of the rack and ruin of our gangster death,
The rape and rot of graft, and stealth, and lies,
We, the people, must redeem
The land, the mines, the plants, the rivers.
The mountains and the endless plain –
All, all the stretch of these great green states –
And make
Ours
is a great country, a beautiful country, a country rich with resources of people
and material goods, a country with tremendous idealism and potential. Last year
a terrible thing happened within the boundaries of what we call our country. An
unspeakable thing, a thing so awful it still defies our comprehension. And yet.
And yet. Do we need to surrender ourselves to blind trust as it has been called
in “Mother Jones” magazine?[1]
Do we need to simply forget the voices of hope and peace and go with raw
emotion? Do we need to listen only to the people we like to hear? Do we need to
stop questioning and asking for information? Or do we need to allow this event
to create the struggle of paradox, the struggle of listening to many voices, the
struggle of a complicated view of the world and our country, the struggle to
define universal human experience and what it means to be patriotic?
The
patriotic zeal that has gripped this nation frightens me. It frightens me
because it seems to have limited what we say and what we hear. The events and
emotions of
In
my sermon from last fall I wrote of three voices, that Rebecca Parker[2]
asks us, in any tragedy, to listen to; the voices of sorrow and grief, anger and
protest and hope and trust. Last year I wrote:
“The
voices of sorrow and grief are deafening. I fear there are many losses yet to
come. … We hear our leaders offer words of war, unforgiving hate filled words
that feel out of control. [In addition to the lives that have been lost] we have
lost reason as we are consumed by the intense emotions of overwhelming pain. I
plead with the universe that these feelings will give way in time to rational
understanding and considered action.
These
voices of pain feed the voices of anger and protest, which are becoming
thunderous as well. It was an unspeakable, horrible act. There is no excuse or
reason that will calm my utter fury at those who would do such a thing. Every
cell of my being protests such acts of hopelessness. Theirs is a world that is
so devoid of hope it leads to acts that lack comprehension, acts that are
antithetical to life. We must learn to listen to these feelings of anger and
protest. We must learn to listen to the fear and desperation of our own people
in the face of these acts. We feel the anger ourselves.
But
like the voices of sorrow, the voices of anger must not be allowed to overshadow
our love and trust in humanity. The voices of reason, hope and the strength of
the human spirit must be allowed to rise as well. We must not allow the hatred
to feed more hatred. The anger is real but it is a secondary emotion brought on
by feelings of powerlessness and sadness. At every opportunity we must listen
carefully to and magnify the voices of hope and trust. The voice of life must be
heard. … There are so many selfless people who let the tragedy strengthen
their resolve to make the world a better place. The stories are touching of
people reaching out to one another. Tears come to me as I hear of the flocks of
people who have given of their lives so others could survive. “We have to do
something,” is the common refrain heard around the country. Many people told
me stories of reaching out to loved ones and long lost friends. In the face of
such death and loss we create connections to life. We have to do something
because life is relentless. It calls to us even amid the deviation and horror.
The flowers will grow through pavement, the people of
What a confusing time it was so filled with raw
emotion. And for me, to a large extent, it remains a complex event that is hard
to grasp. I remember that I hoped desperately “that our love is stronger than
our grief, that the path of peace is still to be chosen over retaliation.”[3]
But
each day, since that day, the radio and television are filled with stories
designed to keep our interest, remind us of the pain, and rally us in support of
our leaders. The voices of hope and trust have all but been lost. The hurt and
angry feelings have prevailed and called our nation to a place of mistrust and
continued raw emotion. Anger and anxiety rule the day. Our emotions have become
pawns in the sport of retaliation. We are even reminded that we must not
question the actions of government in such a time as this.[4]
There is only one set of voices we are asked to hear. I heard many people on
Wednesday talk of not turning on the television or radio. We are tired of the
sensationalism and our nerves are raw; we wonder whether we are unsympathetic or
simply unpatriotic. Rather than deepening our compassion for the world and those
that suffer, it has closed our borders, or hearts and our minds.
We
asked the world to rally around us and help with the tragedy. We asked countries
around the world to think beyond their borders and help us to find the criminals
and bring them to justice. A new collective spirit could have been born in that
time. A kind of universalism of human experience could have been the rallying
cry of the world. We could have furthered our sense of being “world
citizens.” We could, as Martha Nussbaum suggests in her article “Patriotism
and Cosmopolitanism,” have promoted the value of justice for all humans.[5]
The events could have brought a stronger world resolve for justice and peace. It
could have called us to examine our lives and way of being in the world, coming
closer to those constitutional values we espouse.
Instead
we have used it promote the American way of life. We have used the fear and
anger to promote our way as the one true way. We have used the fear and anger to
justify secrecy and loss of freedoms. Perhaps most upsetting, we have become, as
Sisila Bok writes, “moral hypocrites who only use the language of
universality.”[6]
And even that universality is as seen from our eyes only.
Instead
of a growth producing, life enhancing path of examination and articulation of
what it means to be a strong nation in this world we have settled for telling
the world how it will be. The way our government does things is the right and
only way. The way our woman and children live is the right and only way. The way
we conduct our lives and business is the right and only way. Well we have seen
that last one go up in smoke, but here too, in the area of the business
tragedies, we have seen denial and secrecy prevail. Judith Butler writes,
“That is not to say there ought to be no reference to the universal or that it
has become for us an impossibility. … All that means is that there are
cultural conditions for its articulation.”[7]
We
need to allow this event to generate the struggle of articulating the universal
and what it means to be patriotic. It’s a paradox. And oh you know how
ministers love those. The paradox is that without including all the particular
voices we will not be able to define the universal human experiences and without
an understanding of the universality of all human experiences the particular
voices are lost and unimportant.
We
need the particular to get to the universal. We need to hear the voices of pain
and suffering of all the people and not forget. We need to listen to draw us
closer to the experiences of others. We need to listen to the Iraqis, the
Palestinians, the Catholic Priests, the ENRON executives, the people who have
lost loved ones, the firefighters and yes even the President. It is in the
particular experiences of each of us that we come to the universal experiences
that will be the redemption of September 11.
And
the other side of the paradox – the universal as we have and will define it --
will never be universal because of the particular. Our experience of pain and
suffering is not exactly like others. Our way of living is not necessarily the
best for all. We need to allow this event to create the struggle of this
paradox, the struggle of listening to many voices, and creating a universal
human voice.
Thursday
night my husband Alex and I, went to hear the Detroit Symphony. The concert
began with the Star Spangled Banner. Everyone stood. We stood, but not without
reservation. I don’t want anyone to think I don’t feel and believe this is a
great nation. But I also don’t want anyone to think I support all its actions
or that I relate to the type of patriotism that is being called ours. I stood,
Alex stood, but not without ambivalence and mixed emotion. It’s complex.
It’s messy. And it’s not easy.
But
Unitarian Universalists are used to life that way. We are good at the messy, the
gray and the complex. We can lead the way. We can lead the way to listening to
many voices. It is well past time to listen to the voices of hope and
trust. It is well past time to speak of hope and trust. Trust in the
value of reflection and information. Trust in the human spirit. Trust in our
common human experience in all its diversity. Trust in our guts. If what we are
hearing sounds too simplistic, if we feel mixed emotions and ambivalent
feelings, we need to listen to those voices and call it as we see it. May we as
Unitarian Universalists who believe in freedom, reason and tolerance listen and
offer our voices, even when it’s hard, even when we may sound unpatriotic. May
we join the voices of Woody Guthrie and Langston Hughes and struggle to make
[1] Mother Jones July and August 2002 p.22
[2] In an email from that time Rebecca Parker, dean of Starr King School for the Ministry suggests that in times of great difficulty if we listen deeply we can hear at least three voices; the voice of sorrow – for all that has been broken and lost, for all that creates such profound pain, and for the overwhelming grief; the voice of anger or protest – that this has come into our world, that we seem so powerless to change it ; and the voice of trust – that our love is stronger than our grief, that the path of peace is still to be chosen over retaliation, that coming together to sing, to cry and be together gives us some of the strength we need to face the days ahead.
[3]
Rebecca Parker, Dean of
[4] John Ashcroft “This is no time to questions the actions of the federal government”
[5] For Love of Country Martha Nussbaum p. 4
[6] For Love of Country Martha Nussbaum “From Part to Whole” Sisela Bok
[7] Judith Butler “Universality in Culture” For Love of Country Martha Nussbaum